Journal of Cytology

: 2018  |  Volume : 35  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 139--142

Role of squash cytology in intraoperative diagnosis of spinal lesions

Mousumi Kar1, Moumita Sengupta1, Saurav Sarkar1, Saikat Bera1, Chhanda Datta1, Uttara Chatterjee1, Samarendra Nath Ghosh2,  
1 Department of Pathology, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
2 Department of Neurosurgery, Bangur Institute of Neurology, Kolkata, West Bengal, India

Correspondence Address:
Prof. Uttara Chatterjee
57/11A, Ballygunje Circular Road, Kolkata - 700 019, West Bengal


Background: Squash cytology for intra operative diagnosis of central nervous system (CNS) tumors is an immensely important modality. Though its role in brain lesions is unquestionable and has been proven in a number of studies, its utility for spinal lesions is still a grey zone. Aims: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of squash preparation in spinal lesions and its statistical significance (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value) following histological confirmation. Materials and Methods: A total of 57 cases of spinal tumors were taken. May-Grunewald-Giemsa staining (MGG) and Hematoxylin-Eosin (H&E) were done in each one of them. Rest of the tissue was processed for histological diagnosis and results were compared. Results: In our study, histology was taken as the gold standard. By comparing the results, squash preparation had sensitivity of 95.75%, specificity 80.0%, positive predictive value (PPV)95.74%, and negative predictive value (NPV) 80.80%. Schwannoma was found to be the most prevalent tumor in the spine (17/57) in our study, followed by meningioma (13/57). Diagnostic accuracy for schwannoma was fairly high i.e. 92.3%, followed by meningioma (82.35%). Highest diagnostic accuracy was documented in intradural, extramedullary compartment. Conclusion: Inspite of having pitfalls and various limitations in case of spinal lesions, squash preparation is a rapid and easy method with fairly high diagnostic accuracy. So it can be reliably used as an intraoperative diagnostic tool in spinal lesions.

How to cite this article:
Kar M, Sengupta M, Sarkar S, Bera S, Datta C, Chatterjee U, Ghosh SN. Role of squash cytology in intraoperative diagnosis of spinal lesions.J Cytol 2018;35:139-142

How to cite this URL:
Kar M, Sengupta M, Sarkar S, Bera S, Datta C, Chatterjee U, Ghosh SN. Role of squash cytology in intraoperative diagnosis of spinal lesions. J Cytol [serial online] 2018 [cited 2022 Sep 27 ];35:139-142
Available from:

Full Text


The role of squash cytology for rapid intraoperative cytological diagnosis of space-occupying lesions (SOLs) in the brain is well established and has been an important diagnostic tool over the last few decades. However, its role in spinal lesions remains unexplored. There is sparse literature available on squash cytology of spinal lesions. In the recent times, the rapid cytological diagnosis for spinal lesions is also gaining importance, which poses considerable diagnostic challenge to neuropathologists. This is useful for individualized treatment. In spite of having several pitfalls, intraoperative diagnosis is important, as it helps surgeons to decide on optimal line of management for various spinal lesions without having to wait for routine paraffin-embedded sections. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of squash preparation of spinal lesions and its concordance with final histological diagnosis.

 Materials and Methods

This study was conducted over a period of 16 months in the Department of Pathology in collaboration with Department of Neurosurgery in a tertiary care hospital. A total of 57 cases of spinal tumors were included in this study. A small portion of the specimen was squashed with the help of two slides and smeared. The slides were then stained using May–Grunewald–Giemsa and hematoxylin–eosin methods. Rest of the tissue was put through for formalin fixation and paraffin embedding for final histological diagnosis.

Detailed clinical profile and radiological findings were available during intraoperative diagnosis. Final diagnosis was made on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections and the results were compared with the initial cytological diagnosis. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated using GraphPad Prism 5 and GraphPad.


A total of 57 cases of spinal SOLs were studied by squash cytology and subsequent histology. The mean age of presentation was 43.35 years with no significant sex preponderance. We had 29 male patients and 28 female patients with an almost equal sex ratio. All of the 13 cases of meningioma were, however, seen in women patients. Majority of the spinal tumors were located in intradural, extramedullary (IDEM) compartment (61.4%), followed by intradural, intramedullary (IDIM) lesions (24.6%). Extradural, extramedullary (EDEM) lesions were found only in 14.03% cases. In all cases squash cytological diagnosis was compared with final histological diagnosis, which was considered to be the gold standard. The spectrum of spinal lesions in our series along with its diagnostic accuracy has been summarized in [Table 1].{Table 1}

The commonest lesion observed in our series was Schwannoma (29.8% of the total cases) followed by meningioma (22.8%) [Figure 1]a,[Figure 1]b,[Figure 1]c,[Figure 1]d. The other commonly found tumors were diffuse astrocytoma [World Health Organization (WHO) grade II], metastatic tumors, and neurofibroma. In one case we got totally necrotic material in squash preparation, which was later diagnosed to be a case of renal cell carcinoma metastasis on histology. The provisional cytological diagnosis was made and categorized as benign or malignant followed by grading. Final histological diagnosis was made according to WHO classification and grading.{Figure 1}

In our study, diagnosis by squash preparation had a sensitivity of 95.75%, specificity 80.0%, PPV 95.74%, and NPV 80.80%. Diagnostic accuracy by squash cytology for schwannoma was fairly high (92.3%), followed by meningioma (82.35%). Gliomas also showed good concordance by squash preparation. However, we faced difficulty in diagnosing extradural lesions by squash preparation.

The major diagnostic discrepancies with regard to cell type and grading errors are tabulated in [Table 2] [Figure 2]a,[Figure 2]b,[Figure 2]c,[Figure 2]d,[Figure 2]e,[Figure 2]f. A case of spinal metastasis from renal cell carcinoma was misdiagnosed as tuberculosis of spine, as it is very common in developing countries and also shows extensive necrosis. One case of chordoma was diagnosed as chordoid meningioma [Figure 2]b and one case of aneurysmal bone cyst were diagnosed as giant cell tumor of spine due to presence of numerous giant cells. A case of hemangiopericytoma (HPC) was diagnosed as small round cell tumor (SRCT) [Figure 2c].{Table 2}{Figure 2}

We also assessed diagnostic accuracy of squash cytology in each individual anatomical compartments, i.e., EDEM, IDEM, and IDIM. In our study the diagnostic accuracy was highest for IDEM tumors and lowest for EDEM tumors. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of squash cytology in each anatomical compartment have been tabulated in [Table 3].{Table 3}


The use of intraoperative diagnosis by cytology was started in 1930 by Eisenhardt and Cushing, followed by Badt in 1937.[1],[2] The importance of squash cytology is increasing day-by-day, especially with the introduction of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging-guided stereotactic biopsies.[3] The purpose of intraoperative squash cytology is mainly to provide surgeons adequate details about the lesion, so that the extent of surgery can be optimized and further therapeutic approach can be modified in an individualized manner.[4],[5] The role of squash cytology in diagnosing brain lesions has been well documented in many studies, but its role in spinal tumors is still a gray zone. Hence, the aim of our study was mainly to assess its utility in spinal tumors.

In our study, the diagnostic sensitivity of squash preparation was 95.75%, specificity 80.0%, PPV 95.74%, and NPV 80.80%. We further documented diagnostic accuracy of squash cytology in individual tumors. Diagnostic accuracy for schwannoma was 92.3%, followed by meningioma (82.35%).

In a similar study, squash cytology done on central nervous system lesions (both on spinal and brain SOLs) documented sensitivity of 91.6%, specificity and PPV 100%, and 88% overall diagnostic accuracy.[3] In another series, brain and spinal lesions were taken together and documented the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of squash cytology to be 94.79, 95.67, and 95.25%, respectively.[6] There is practically no data available on spinal lesions alone.

In a study done on both neoplastic and nonneoplastic brain lesions, diagnostic accuracy of squash cytology was found to be 93.3%.[7]

Although specificity and diagnostic accuracy rates are higher for brain SOLs than spinal lesions in various studies, we found that the results of our series based on spinal SOLs alone are also comparable.

In some series it has been documented that diagnosis by frozen section yields a more accurate result than squash cytology.[8],[9] The soft friable nature and high water content of brain tissue impose considerable difficulty in preparing a good quality frozen section.[10] Squash is a simple, rapid method and there are less chances of contamination of instruments than in frozen section with regard to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), prions diseases, etc.[9],[11] Although the merits of squash cytology over frozen section remain the same as in the case of brain SOLs, but presence of fibrous elements and sometimes bony spicules in spinal tissues often causes difficulty in smearing and thereby imposes difficulty in its interpretation.[12],[13] Bony and gritty nature of EDEM tumors, such as aneurysmal bone cyst, giant cell tumors, etc., causes errors in proper diagnosis by squash preparation alone. In our study, we found the diagnostic accuracy of these tumors by squash to be lower than other compartments.

Squash preparation provides invaluable cytological information such as cytoplasmic and nuclear details along with important cellular architecture such as rosettes, whorls, etc.[14],[15],[16] It is devoid of freezing artifacts as seen in frozen sections. But artifacts such as crushing, overstretching, and cellular overlapping can impose problems in making an accurate diagnosis by squash. Thickness of the prepared slides is also not uniform throughout the smear. Too thick or too thin areas can also cause diagnostic discrepancies.[17]

Some of the reasons behind discordant cases were cautery artifact during surgery and presence of necrotic tissue. These factors can lead to overdiagnosis or underdiagnosis of tumors. As Pott's spine is very common in developing countries, necrosis often leads to diagnosis of tuberculosis. In our study, a metastatic renal cell carcinoma was diagnosed as spinal tuberculosis due to presence of necrotic material only.

Interpretation of various giant cell containing lesions can also be misleading. A case of aneurysmal bone cyst was diagnosed as giant cell tumor due to presence of hemorrhage and giant cells. Due to presence of large vacuolated cells, one case was misdiagnosed as chordoid meningioma, which was later confirmed to be chordoma by histology. So, pathologists should be aware of other differential diagnosis and correlate cytological findings with clinical presentation and imaging studies.

Overlapping cellular architecture can also be dubious. Though we got a high diagnostic accuracy rate for schwannomas (92.3%) and meningiomas (82.35%), a case each of fibroblastic meningioma and neurofibroma were diagnosed as schwannoma due to presence of elongated spindle cell and absence of characteristic whorls of meningioma. Similar errors in interpretation have been reported by various other studies too.[6],[18] HPC is a common spinal lesion of intermediate grade malignancy. Presence of round cells in HPC often causes diagnostic difficulty. In our study, a single case of HPC was diagnosed as SRCT.

Tanycytic ependymoma is a common tumor of the spine which has relatively few perivascular rosettes, and the presence of spindle-shaped cells can be misleading. It can be mistaken for pilocytic astrocytoma or schwannoma. In our series, it was misdiagnosed as schwannoma.

Paraganglioma is very common in lower lumbar spine. The cells of paraganglioma can sometimes resemble the epithelial cells found in ependymoma. In this study one case of paraganglioma was misdiagnosed as ependymoma [Figure 2]a.

Exact grading of the lesions can sometimes be erroneous. A conspicuous fibrillary background is helpful to categorize a lesion as glial tumor,[14],[17] but further subclassification can be a challenge due to its cellular heterogeneity. In our study, a case of pilocytic astrocytoma (WHO grade I) was misdiagnosed as diffuse astrocytoma (WHO grade II). The ependymomas can also be difficult to grade and subtype on cytology alone. A case of myxopapillary ependymoma (WHO grade I) [Figure 1]d in our series was diagnosed as ependymoma (WHO grade II).

SRCTs such as primitive neuro ectodermal tumor (PNET), lymphoma, and even hemangiopericytoma can show similar appearance on squash cytology.[14],[19] In our series, a case of lymphoma and one case of PNET were diagnosed as SRCT as exact differentiation could not be made on cytology.

So, we can conclude that squash cytology is an important intraoperative diagnostic tool in management of brain tumors. Its role in spinal lesion is not yet established. In our study we found that the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of spinal lesion although lower but is comparable with brain SOLs, especially in case of IDEM and IDIM compartments.

It is also important in case of spinal tumors to bear in mind the radiological finding, age distribution, and anatomical location to come to an accurate cytological diagnosis.

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.


1Eisenhardt L, Cushing H. Diagnosis of intracranial tumours by supravital technique. Am J Pathol 1930;6:541-52.
2Berkeley BB, Adams JH, Doyle D, Graham DI, Harper CG. The smear technique in the diagnosis of neurosurgical biopsies. N Z Med J 1978;87:12-5.
3Pawar N, Deshpande K, Surase S, D'Costa G. Evaluation of the squash smear technique in the rapid diagnosis of central nervous system tumors: A cytomorphological study. Internet J Pathol 2009;11:1.
4Roessler K, Dietrich W, Kitz K. High diagnostic accuracy of cytologic smears of central nervous tumors. A 15-year experience based on 4172 patients. Acta Cytol 2002;46:664-7.
5Yachnis AT. Intraoperative consultation for nervous system lesions. Semin Diagn Pathol 2002;19:192-206.
6Kishore S, Bhardwaj A, Kusum A Thakur B, Kaushik S, et al. Intraoperative squash cytology of central nervous system and spinal cord lesions with histological correlation. Ann Pathol Lab Med 2016;3:61-72.
7Qureshi IA, Jamal S, Mamoon N, Luqman M, Sharif MA. Usefulness of crush smears intraoperative consultation of neurological biopsies. J Coll Phys Surg Pak 2006;16:590-3.
8Mitra S, Kumar M, Sharma V, Mukhopadhyay D. Squash preparation: A reliable diagnostic tool in the intraoperative diagnosis of central nervous system tumors. J Cytol 2010;27:81-5.
9Reyes MG, Homsi MF, McDonald LW, Glick RP. Imprints, smears, and frozen sections of brain tumors. Neurosurgery 1991;29:575-9.
10Savargaonkar P, Farmer PM. Utility of intra-operative consultations for the diagnosis of central nervous system lesions. Ann Clin Lab Sci 2001;31:133-9.
11Shukla K, Parikh B, Shukla J, Trivedi P, Shah B. Accuracy of cytologic diagnosis of central nervous system tumours in crush preparation. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2006;49:483-6.
12Folkerth RD. Smears and frozen sections in the intraoperative diagnosis of central nervous system lesions. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1994;5:1-18.
13Asha T, Shankar SK, Rao TV, Das S. Role of squash-smear technique for rapid diagnosis of neurosurgical biopsies-a cytomorphological evaluation. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 1989;32:152-60.
14Deb P, Sharma S. Intraoperative neurocytology of primary central nervous system neoplasia: A simplified and practical diagnostic approach. J Cytol 2011;28:147-58.
15Adesina AM. Intraoperative consultation in diagnosis of pediatric brain tumors. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2005;129:1653-60.
16Brainard JA, Prayson RA, Barnett GH. Frozen section evaluation of stereotactic brain biopsies: Diagnostic yield at the stereotactic target position in 188 cases. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1997;121:481-4.
17Rao S, Rajkumar A, Ehtesham MD, Duruvu P. Challenges in neurosurgical intraoperative consultation. Neurol India 2009; 57:464-8.
18Kobayashi S. Meningiomas, neurilemmoma and astrocytoma specimens obtained with the squash method for cytodiagnosis. A cytological and immunohistochemical study. Acta Cytol 1993;37:913-22.
19Plesec TP, Prayson RA. Frozen section discrepancy in the evaluation of central nervous system tumors. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2007; 131:1532-40.