|
|
| Year : 2010 | Volume
: 27
| Issue : 1 | Page : 40-41 |
|
| Maltese cross: Starch artifact in oral cytology, divulged through polarized microscopy |
|
|
Kiran Balasaheb Jadhav, Nidhi Gupta, BR Ahmed Mujib
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Bapuji Dental College and Hospital, Davangere, Karnataka, India
Click here for correspondence address and email
| Date of Web Publication | 23-Jul-2010 |
|
|
 |
|
How to cite this article:
Jadhav KB, Gupta N, Ahmed Mujib B R. Maltese cross: Starch artifact in oral cytology, divulged through polarized microscopy. J Cytol 2010;27:40-1 |
How to cite this URL:
Jadhav KB, Gupta N, Ahmed Mujib B R. Maltese cross: Starch artifact in oral cytology, divulged through polarized microscopy. J Cytol [serial online] 2010 [cited 2023 Mar 23];27:40-1. Available from: https://www.jcytol.org/text.asp?2010/27/1/40/66698 |
Sir,
An artifact (L.ars-art+factum-made) in histology means any nonnatural feature or structure accidentally introduced into something being observed or studied. Starch powder, a lubricant of surgical gloves, is well recognized as a common contaminant of cytological and histological specimens. [1]
Glove powder is chemically altered starch that includes donning powders, mold-release compounds and manufacturing debris. Cornstarch as a component of donning powder is the most common lubricant in gloves used for patient examination gloves. [2]
Although common, this artifact is potentially confusing in oral cytological specimens. [1] Recently, Pinto et al.[3] have reported starch artifacts in oral biopsy specimens. Starch powder is a well-documented iatrogenic cause for granulomatous lesions, both extraorally and intraorally. [1] In such situations, severe foreign body reactions may be seen, like starch granulomas. On the other hand, accidental starch granule contamination of biopsy tissues may occur during surgical removal or during specimen processing in the laboratory. In these cases, there is no inflammatory reaction associated with the starch granules. [3]
A study was conducted to confirm the starch granules in cytosmears. The cytosmears were taken from the normal buccal mucosa of a healthy volunteer. Smears were taken without wearing gloves and again smears were repeated after palpating the buccal mucosa with gloves. These smears were stained with various staining methods, including rapid papanicolaou stain, hematoxylin and eosin stain, Masson trichrome stain, congo red stain and periodic acid schiff stain. These smears were then compared under a light microscope and a polarized microscope. The starch granules were absent in all smears from controls whereas they were found to be present in all the smears obtained following palpation of the same area with gloves [Figure 1].
Starch granules in cytologic smears appear as refractile, glassy, polygonal bodies, generally about 5-20 micrometer in diameter. They often exhibit a central dot or "Y"-shaped structure [Figure 1]a. The granules were PAS-positive and stained weakly green with Masson trichrome stain. Further evaluation under polarized light microscopy revealed the "Maltese cross" birefringence pattern, suggestive of starch granules [Figure 1]b.
A central dark area, as in [Figure 1]a, can be misinterpreted as a pyknotic nucleus or for cell undergoing mitosis under light microscope. [1] Moreover, Lovas et al.[1] have cited that these bodies might resemble epithelial cells. With scanning electron microscopy, starch granules appear as spherical, faceted balls, which can vary from 2.5 to 30 micrometer in diameter. [1] The same with scanning electron microscopy varied from 5 to 20 micrometer in diameter. [3] The Maltese cross under polarized light is characteristic, but not specific, for starch and can also be seen with some inorganic particles. [1]
Chlorinated natural latex rubber gloves are a common alternative to glove powder. Making use of synthetic polymer-coated gloves is yet another possibility. [2]
The purpose of this letter is to call the attention towards this artifact, which may be routinely found in a cytological smear. An adequate degree of consideration could significantly avoid erroneous conclusions.
 References | |  |
| 1. | Lovas GL, Howell RE, Peters E, Gardner DG. Starch artifacts in oral cytologic specimens. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1985;60:195-6.  [PUBMED] |
| 2. | Stratmeyer M, Walsh D. Medical Glove Powder Report. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/.../ucm126383.htmn.2009 . |
| 3. | Pinto LS, da Silva AA, Leσn JE, Jorge J. Letter to the editor: starch artifacts in oral biopsy specimen. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2008;13:336-7. |
Correspondence Address:
Kiran Balasaheb Jadhav
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Bapuji Dental College and Hospital, Davangere, Karnataka
India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/0970-9371.66698
[Figure 1] |
|
| This article has been cited by | | 1 |
A review of wheat starch analyses: Methods, techniques, structure and function |
|
| Jihong Huang, Zhen Wang, Ling Fan, Sen Ma | | International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2022; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 2 |
An unusual dermoscopic presentation of eruptive lichen planus dominated by rosettes and blink sign |
|
| Siddhartha Dash, Biswanath Behera, Aparna Palit, Madhusmita Sethy, Ashish Kumar Nayak, Pavithra Ayyanar | | Australasian Journal of Dermatology. 2021; 62(1): 72 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 3 |
Contaminants and mimickers in cytopathology |
|
| S Muzarath, SonamS Nandyal, BJ Bindu, CNarayana Murthy | | Journal of Cytology. 2020; 37(3): 131 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 4 |
Be aware: rosettes may be a transitory dermoscopic finding in scars |
|
| Luciana P. Antoniolli, Gabriela F. Escobar | | Australasian Journal of Dermatology. 2020; 61(3): 282 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 5 |
Starry night in suture town |
|
| Tatiana R. Rothacker,Angela Royal | | Veterinary Clinical Pathology. 2019; 48(2): 237 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 6 |
Nonconformities in Veterinary Cytopathological Examinations: A Retrospective Study of Unsuitable Samples for Analysis |
|
| Melina Barreto Gomes da Silva, Ingrid Cavalcanti Pascoal, Órion Pedro da Silva, Amanda de Deus Ferreira Alves, Saulo Romero Félix Gonçalves, Mariana Lumack do Monte Barretto, José Wilton Pinheiro Junior, Márcia de Figueiredo Pereira, Andrea Alice da Fonseca Oliveira | | Acta Veterinaria. 2019; 69(3): 251 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 7 |
Rosettes: Optical effects and not dermoscopic patterns related to skin neoplasms |
|
| Pietro Rubegni,Domenico R. Tataranno,Niccolò Nami,Michele Fimiani | | Australasian Journal of Dermatology. 2013; 54(4): 271 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 8 |
Suture artefacts: Explored through polarising microscope |
|
| Grover, S. and Naik, R. and Jayadeva, H.M. and Ahmed Mujib, B.R. | | Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal. 2012; 12(2): 247-248 | | [Pubmed] | | | 9 |
Biopsy and Tissue Processing Artifacts in Oral Mucosal Tissues |
|
| Kiran Kumar, Devi Charan Shetty, Mahima Dua | | International Journal of Head and Neck Surgery. 2012; 3(2): 92 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Article Access Statistics | | | Viewed | 4300 | | | Printed | 152 | | | Emailed | 0 | | | PDF Downloaded | 228 | | | Comments | [Add] | | | Cited by others | 9 | | |
|
|
