|
|
| Year : 2008 | Volume
: 25
| Issue : 3 | Page : 81-86 |
|
| Cytology of soft tissue tumors: Benign soft tissue tumors including reactive, nonneoplastic lesions |
|
|
Venkateswaran K Iyer
Department of Pathology, AIIMS, New Delhi, India
Click here for correspondence address and email
|
|
 |
|
How to cite this article:
Iyer VK. Cytology of soft tissue tumors: Benign soft tissue tumors including reactive, nonneoplastic lesions. J Cytol 2008;25:81-6 |
How to cite this URL:
Iyer VK. Cytology of soft tissue tumors: Benign soft tissue tumors including reactive, nonneoplastic lesions. J Cytol [serial online] 2008 [cited 2023 Mar 22];25:81-6. Available from: https://www.jcytol.org/text.asp?2008/25/3/81/44034 |
 Introduction | |  |
Soft tissues are the supportive tissue of various organs as well as the nonepithelial, extraskeletal structures. They include adipose tissue, fibrous connective tissue, skeletal muscle, blood vessels, and the peripheral nervous system. Soft tissues are almost entirely derived from the mesoderm except for the peripheral nerves. Soft tissue tumors, being a large heterogeneous group of neoplasms, are classified according to histogenesis, as detailed below. [1] Most have benign and malignant counterparts; some are of borderline malignant potential with aggressive local invasion.
The incidence of benign soft tissue tumors is about ten times that of malignant ones. Benign deep masses in adults are usually due to intramuscular lipoma. Extremity masses larger than 5-7 cm and deeper than subcutaneous tissue, favour the diagnosis of a malignant soft tissue tumor. Benign tumors are usually superficial and well defined or encapsulated masses showing slow growth. [1] Of the imaging methods commonly used for evaluation, magnetic resonance imaging best defines the relationship between a tumor and its adjacent anatomic structures, such as compartment boundaries, nerves, vessels, and muscle. [2] This article will discuss the fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of benign soft tissue tumors, including reactive and nonneoplastic lesions. The complete list of such tumors is given in [Table 1] for ready reference, followed by the FNAC features in detail.
| WHO (2002) Classification of Soft Tissue Tumors | | |
Soft tissue tumors are divided into the following four categories:
Benign : These usually do not recur locally, and if they do, the recurrence is nondestructive and almost always readily curable by complete local excision. Morphologically benign lesions which are extremely rare, may give rise to distant metastases that cannot be predicted on the basis of routine, histological evaluation. Cutaneous benign fibrous histiocytoma is the best example.
Intermediate (locally aggressive) : These tumors show an infiltrative and locally destructive growth pattern; however, they do not metastasise. The example in this category is fibromatosis.
Intermediate (rarely metastasising) : These tumors are often locally aggressive but in some cases, they also have a tendency to produce distant metastases (usually in a lymph node or lung). This risk is low (< 2%). The classic examples are plexiform fibrohistiocytic tumors and angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma.
Malignant : Soft tissue sarcomas are locally destructive with the potential to recur; the risk of distant metastasis is significant. (Depending on the histological type and grade, the potential ranges from 20 to almost 100%.)
| Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology | | |
Benign soft tissue tumors usually present with superficial small swellings, usually in the subcutaneous tissue, and are best assessed by FNAC. [3],[4],[5],[6] Although numerous histopathological entities are currently known (as listed above), the majority are rare and can only be diagnosed on histology. The commonly encountered soft tissue tumors and lesions and their FNAC appearance are described below.
Lipoma
This is the most commonly encountered swelling that is subjected to FNAC. Clinical findings of the swelling are essential in its differentiation from subcutaneous fibroadipose tissue, accurate needle placement within the mass being the most important criterion. Lipomas are usually solitary but may be multiple, and the swelling slips under the examining hand.
Aspirates show adipose tissue which is indistinguishable from normal fibroadipose tissue [Figure 1]. Delicate vessels without much fibrous tissue are the rule. [7],[8] The fat cells are univacuolated with nuclei pushed to the periphery. Intramuscular lipomas may be admixed with skeletal muscle. These have to be differentiated from myxomas which also occur in this location, the aspirates of which have myxoid material with stellate cells. [9] The presence of atypical nuclei may be indicative of benign lesions such as atypical lipoma or a well differentiated liposarcoma. Lipoblasts in the aspirate usually indicate a well differentiated liposarcoma. However, lipid-laden macrophages may mimic lipoblasts making cytological identification difficult. The presence of these findings indicates the necessity for histological examination for proper evaluation, which can be recommended on FNAC.
| Benign Nerve Sheath Tumor | | |
Schwannomas and neurofibromas may be solitary or multiple (in neurofibromatosis) and are commonly aspirated for diagnosis. Aspiration from neurofibromas is usually painful. Aspirates are cellular and show spindle cell morphology with moderate cellularity. A fibrillary background is common in both schwannomas and neurofibromas. [10] Nuclei of both tumors are long with pointed ends and have a "buckled" or twisted appearance [Figure 2]. The presence of nuclear palisading (or Verrocay bodies) favors a schwannoma over a neurofibroma but FNAC cannot help make this distinction cannot be reliably made in its absence.
Some aspirates show nuclear enlargement and pleomorphism. [11] This is a common finding in large benign nerve sheath tumors that warrants a careful search for mitotic figures and histological examination of an excision biopsy is essential for proper evaluation. The presence of mitotic figures even in aspirates not showing nuclear pleomorphism, may indicate transformation to a malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor.
Fibromatosis
This is a locally aggressive tumor and is currently classified in the intermediate WHO grade. However, this is a common tumor which is frequently assessed by FNAC. It has site predilections which should be taken into account before the interpretation of the FNAC findings.
Aspirates from fibromatosis have variable cellularity. [12],[13] Those with low cellularity are benign in appearance [Figure 3] and are composed of spindle-shaped fibroblasts arranged in groups interspersed with collagen (and not fibrillary material as with nerve sheath tumors). Single cells are seen in the background; mitotic figures are rare.
Aspirates from aggressive fibromatosis are more cellular although mitoses are rare to absent. [12] Collagen matrix is more difficult to identify in aspirates [Figure 4]. Such tumors are difficult to differentiate from low-grade spindle cell sarcomas and hence, an inconclusive report on cytology and a subsequent histological examination is needed for diagnosis.
Leiomyoma
Leiomyomas are much less common in the subcutaneous region as compared to lipomas, nerve sheath tumors, and fibromatosis. Leiomyoma is differentiated from leiomyosarcoma based on the mitotic counts done as part of the histological examination. As such, FNAC has a limited role in diagnosis. The main objective is the identification of smooth muscle differentiation on FNAC which may be difficult to accomplish. A diagnosis of a nonspecific, benign spindle cell tumor is usually returned.
Aspirates from leiomyoma are usually sparsely cellular, although some aspirates may be cellular. [14] The tumor cells may have clear-cut, spindle-shaped cytoplasmic processes on either side that stain pale blue in Giemsa stain [Figure 5]. Bare nuclei may predominate in some aspirates and if necrosis is found, a differential diagnosis with a leiomyosarcoma would require a biopsy.
Benign fibrous histiocytoma group
This is a group of neoplasms which on aspiration, show an admixture of spindle-shaped fibroblastic cells and polygonal histiocytic cells. A number of tumors such as dermatofibroma, tendon sheath fibroma, and proliferative fasciitis among others, have a similar appearance on aspiration, and hence, a definite diagnosis of benign fibrous histiocytoma cannot be made. [15]
Aspirates from benign fibrous histiocytomas show spindle-shaped fibroblasts with collagenised stroma and polygonal cells with a moderate amount of foamy cytoplasm [Figure 6]. Giant cells may be seen including Touton giant cells. May-Grünwald-Giemsa (MGG) staining may show polygonal cells with blue cytoplasm; mitotic figures are absent. Pleomorphism may be seen in the giant cells.
Giant cell tumor of the tendon sheath
This tumor usually occurs in the fingers and toes and may be associated with trauma. It is still uncertain whether it represents a true neoplasm or a reactive proliferation in response to trauma. It is mostly considered to belong to the benign fibrous histiocytoma group. However, as its typical clinical and cytological features permit diagnosis, it requires separate mention. Location is classical and radiological demonstration of the lack of bone involvement is useful in diagnosis.
Aspirates show multinucleated giant cells of osteoclastic cell type and two kinds of stromal cells: spindle-shaped cells and polygonal cells with cytoplasm. [16] Nuclear grooves are frequent in the stromal cells [Figure 7]; binucleated cells are seen.
Unlike the giant cell tumor of the bone which may involve soft tissues, the cellularity of the aspirates is less in giant cell tumors of the tendon sheath. The latter also show less pleomorphism of the stromal component and show the presence of typical polygonal and binucleate cells.
Benign tumor-like and reactive conditions of soft tissues
A number of conditions with unclear etiology are grouped together under the general category of tumor-like conditions of the soft tissue. It is now clear that a majority of these are actually neoplastic and hence, the term, "tumor-like" is inappropriate. Although these are grouped under neoplasms in the WHO classification, they are still regarded by tradition as being tumor-like or reactive conditions. Of these, the most important are nodular fasciitis, proliferative fasciitis, proliferative myositis, myositis ossificans, and inflammatory pseudotumor. Fine needle aspiration cytology of these entities is considered below, along with atypical fibroxanthoma which is a benign tumor with features mimicking malignancy.
Inflammatory pseudotumor
Alhough this tumor shows cytogenetic and molecular abnormalities which place it within the neoplastic category, it is still best regarded as a morphologic entity showing mainly inflammatory cells with a pleomorphic spindle cell component mimicking a tumor. The term, "pseudotumor" is therefore, appropriate. As the atypical spindle cells are myofibroblastic, it can be termed as an inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor. It can occur in any location and in different age groups including children, presenting as a mass lesion that is commonly subjected to FNAC.
Aspirates from inflammatory pseudotumors usually have an inflammatory background with a predominance of acute or chronic inflammatory cells in different cases; plasma cells are frequent. However, the most striking feature is the presence of pleomorphic spindle cells and these aspirates are usually suspected to be malignant [Figure 8]. An inflammatory malignant fibrous histiocytoma is a close differential that usually has tumor giant cells which are not an important feature of inflammatory pseudotumors. It is therefore, important not to diagnose a malignancy in these cases, but to instead produce an inconclusive report stating the necessity for a biopsy characterization. [17] On Giemsa-stained slides, the myofibroblastic cells have characteristic grayish blue cytoplasm.
Atypical fibroxanthoma
This is another tumor which can be misdiagnosed as being malignant on aspiration. This tumor typically occurs as a small skin nodule on the sun-exposed skin of elderly individuals. On aspiration, highly pleomorphic cells are seen and a myxoid background may be present [Figure 9]. It is important not to misdiagnose this as a malignancy but to give an inconclusive report asking for a biopsy diagnosis.
Nodular fasciitis, proliferative fasciitis, and proliferative myositis
Nodular fasciitis presents as a rapidly enlarging, tender skin nodule in the upper limbs of young adults. Aspirates tend to be cellular with cohesive cell groups having a feathery edge. [18] Most tumor cells appear stellate with long cytoplasmic processes [Figure 10]. Nuclei are finely granular with inconspicuous nucleoli. Ganglion-like cells and inflammatory cells including foamy macrophages may be found.
Proliferative fasciitis is similar to nodular fasciitis, occurring in the lower limbs in an older age group than nodular fasciitis. Proliferative myositis also affects older individuals in the shoulder and scapular regions. Aspiration cytology findings are similar to nodular fasciitis with a more frequent presence of ganglion-like cells. [19],[20] Atypical spindle cells can also be seen in myositis ossificans and must not be misdiagnosed as a malignancy. [21] Classical locations and correlation with radiography findings are essential for proper diagnosis of these lesions.
Benign spindle cell tumors: Approach to diagnosis
Aspirates from swellings may not show the typical findings detailed above and in many instances, it is enough to make a distinction from malignancy on FNAC rather than give a precise histological diagnosis. In any aspirate from a spindle cell lesion, the main criteria to be assessed are cellularity, nuclear pleomorphism, mitosis, and necrosis. In aspirates from any tumor showing spindle cell fragments with high cellularity and/or nuclear pleomorphism in the form of hyperchromasia or anisonucleosis and/or mitotic figures and/or presence of necrosis, any one feature should prompt an inconclusive report making histological examination mandatory. Aspirates not showing definite necrosis or any mitosis or clearly pleomorphic nuclei or very high cellularity should be carefully evaluated to distinguish a low-grade sarcoma from a benign spindle cell lesion. [22] Even the slightest increase of cellularity or nuclear chromatin abnormality in the absence of specific features for one of the above tumors, should mandate a histological examination.
To conclude, the purpose of FNAC in benign soft tissue lesions is to be an initial screening test to differentiate from infective lesions and it should be used to triage patients requiring early biopsy. The specific diagnosis is almost always made on histopathology and FNAC should not be used as a replacement for an excision biopsy. Immunocytochemistry on aspirates has little role in the evaluation of benign mesenchymal lesions and will anyway not help to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions.
| References | | |
| 1. | Shidham VB. Benign and malignant soft tissue tumors. E-medicine 2006.  |
| 2. | Chang AE, Matory YL, Dwyer AJ, Hill SC, Girton ME, Steinberg SM, et al . Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography in the evaluation of soft tissue tumors of the extremities. Ann Surg 1987;205:340-8. |
| 3. | Barth RJ Jr, Merino MJ, Solomon D, Yang JC, Baker AR. A prospective study of the value of core needle biopsy and fine needle aspiration in the diagnosis of soft tissue masses. Surgery 1992;112:536-43. |
| 4. | Bennert KW, Abdul-Karim FW. Fine needle aspiration cytology vs. needle core biopsy of soft tissue tumors: A comparison. Acta Cytol 1994;38:381-4. |
| 5. | Epstein HD. Fine-needle aspiration of soft tissue lesions. Pathology 1996;4:463-92. |
| 6. | Willιn H, Akerman M, Carlιn B. Fine needle aspiration (FNA) in the diagnosis of soft tissue tumors; a review of 22 years experience. Cytopathology 1995;6:236-47. |
| 7. | Akerman M, Rydholm A. Aspiration cytology of lipomatous tumors: A 10-year experience at an orthopedic oncology center. Diagn Cytopathol 1987;3:295-302. |
| 8. | Walaas L, Kindblom LG. Lipomatous tumors: A correlative cytologic and histologic study of 27 tumors examined by fine needle aspiration cytology. Hum Pathol 1985;16:6-18. |
| 9. | Akerman M, Rydholm A. Aspiration cytology of intramuscular myxoma: A comparative clinical, cytologic and histologic study of ten cases. Acta Cytol 1983;27:505-10. |
| 10. | Dahl I, Hagmar B, Idvall I. Benign solitary neurilemmoma (Schwannoma): A correlative cytological and histological study of 28 cases. Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand (A) 1984;92:91-101. |
| 11. | Ryd W, Mugal S, Ayyash K. Ancient neurilemmoma: A pitfall in the cytologic diagnosis of soft tissue tumors. Diagn Cytopathol 1986;2:244-7. |
| 12. | Raab SS, Silverman JF, McLeod DL, Benning TL, Geisinger KR. Fine needle aspiration biopsy of fibromatoses. Acta Cytol 1993;37:323-8. |
| 13. | Zaharopoulos P, Wong JY. Fine needle aspiration cytology in fibromatoses. Diagn Cytopathol 1992;8:73-8. |
| 14. | Tao LC, Davidson DD. Aspiration biopsy cytology of smooth muscle tumors: A cytologic approach to the differentiation between leiomyosarcoma and leiomyoma. Acta Cytol 1993;37:300-8. |
| 15. | Layfield LJ, Moffatt EJ, Dodd LG, Scully SP, Harrelson JM. Cytologic findings in tenosynovial giant cell tumors investigated by fine needle aspiration cytology. Diagn Cytopathol 1997;6:317-25. |
| 16. | Iyer VK, Kapila K, Verma K. Fine needle aspiration cytology of giant cell tumor of tendon sheath. Diagn Cytopathol 2003;29:105-10. |
| 17. | Lupovitch A, Chen R, Mishra S. Inflammatory pseudotumor of the liver: Report of the fine needle aspiration cytologic findings in a case initially misdiagnosed as malignant. Acta Cytol 1989;33:259-62. |
| 18. | Dahl I, Akerman M. Nodular fasciitis: A correlative cytologic and histologic study of 13 cases. Acta Cytol 1981;25:215-23. |
| 19. | Lundgren L, Kindblom LG, Willems J, Falkmer U, Angervall L. Proliferative myositis and fasciitis: A light and electron microscopic, cytologic, DNA-cytometric and immunohistochemical study. APMIS 1992;100:437-48. |
| 20. | Meis JM, Enzinger FM. Proliferative fasciitis and myositis of childhood. Am J Surg Pathol 1992;16:364-72. |
| 21. | Rooser B, Herrlin K, Rydholm A, Akerman M. Pseudomalignant myositis ossificans: Clinical, radiologic and cytologic diagnosis in 5 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 1989;60:457-60. |
| 22. | Costa MJ, Campman SC, Davis RL, Howell LP. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of sarcoma: Retrospective review of diagnostic utility and specificity. Diagn Cytopathol 1996;15:23-32. |
Correspondence Address:
Venkateswaran K Iyer
Department of Pathology, AIIMS, New Delhi
India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/0970-9371.44034
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8], [Figure 9], [Figure 10]
[Table 1] |
|
| This article has been cited by | | 1 |
Spectrum of soft tissue lesions in upper and lower extremities on fine needle aspiration cytology: A three years’ experience from Western Indian population |
|
| Sneha Sisodiya, Vaishali P Gaikwad, Leena Naik | | IP Journal of Diagnostic Pathology and Oncology. 2021; 6(4): 301 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 2 |
Solitary adult xanthogranuloma in external auditory canal: Cyto-histopathological correlation of an uncommon entity at an uncommon site |
|
| Sunayana Misra, Kusum Gupta, Renu Gupta | | Diagnostic Cytopathology. 2020; 48(7): 666 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 3 |
Pitfalls in the cytological diagnosis of tenosynovial giant cell tumor: An illustration of eight discordant cases |
|
| Krishnendu Mondal,Rupali Mandal,Kalyan Khan,Jasashwi Chakraborty | | Diagnostic Cytopathology. 2018; 46(3): 250 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 4 |
A mass protruding from the pancreas featuring extensive myxoid change |
|
| Hiromi Takahashi, Sho Ogata, Hideharu Domoto, Tomohiro Oda, Saki Kawaguchi, Kei Kato, Yasuyo Teramura, Kuniaki Nakanishi | | CytoJournal. 2018; 15: 9 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 5 |
Superficial CD34-positive fibroblastic tumor: Cytologic features, tissue correlation, ancillary studies, and differential diagnosis of a recently described soft tissue neoplasm |
|
| Weihong Li,Stacy L. Molnar,Michael Mott,Erik White,Luis E. De Las Casas | | Diagnostic Cytopathology. 2016; 44(11): 926 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 6 |
Core needle biopsy of soft tissue tumors, CEUS vs US guided: a pilot study |
|
| Alessandro Coran,Antonio Di Maggio,Marco Rastrelli,Enrico Alberioli,Shady Attar,Paolo Ortolan,Carlo Bortolanza,Annalisa Tosi,Maria Cristina Montesco,Elisabetta Bezzon,Carlo Riccardo Rossi,Roberto Stramare | | Journal of Ultrasound. 2015; 18(4): 335 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 7 |
Ganglion cell like cells, diagnostic dilemma |
|
| Ammanagi, A.S., Chikkannaiah, P., Yenni, V., Dombale, V.D. | | Indian Journal of Dermatology. 2013; 58(4): 328 | | [Pubmed] | | | 8 |
Review of diagnostic approaches for proliferative myositis, in the light of two cases |
|
| Haidar, R.K., Itani, M., Jabbour, M., Der-Boghossian, A.H., Khoury, N.J. | | Journal of Musculoskeletal Research. 2013; 16(2) | | [Pubmed] | | | 9 |
REVIEW OF DIAGNOSTIC APPROACHES FOR PROLIFERATIVE MYOSITIS, IN THE LIGHT OF TWO CASES |
|
| Rachid K. Haidar,Malak Itani,Mark Jabbour,Asdghig H. Der-Boghossian,Nabil J. Khoury | | Journal of Musculoskeletal Research. 2013; 16(02): 1372002 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 10 |
Confusing cytological findings in myositis ossificans |
|
| Mokhtari, M., Kumar, P.V., Rezazadeh, S. | | Acta Cytologica. 2012; 56(5): 565-570 | | [Pubmed] | | | 11 |
Multicentric synchronous recurrent aggressive fibromatosis |
|
| Kohli, K., Kawatra, V., Khurana, N., Jain, S. | | Journal of Cytology. 2012; 29(1): 57-59 | | [Pubmed] | | | 12 |
Dermatoscopy versus Tzanck smear test: A comparison of the value of two tests in the diagnosis of pigmented skin lesions |
|
| Murat Durdu, Mete Baba, Deniz Seçkin | | Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2011; | | [VIEW] | [DOI] | | | 13 |
Pseudosarcomatous Soft Tissue Lesions: A Review |
|
| Victor Weng Leong Ng | | Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare. 2010; 19(3): 220 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Article Access Statistics | | | Viewed | 51579 | | | Printed | 420 | | | Emailed | 5 | | | PDF Downloaded | 1588 | | | Comments | [Add] | | | Cited by others | 13 | | |
|
|
